Decision support

Diagnostics

Ranked diagnostics by what we'd learn, which root cause theories they'd promote or rule out, and how results would change treatment options.

#1
Tissue-based mosaic-sensitive deep sequencing (buccal swab, skin punch, or hair follicle) for PROS / mTORopathy genes

recommended_not_done

Geneticsbuccal swab + 3-5 mm skin punch biopsy (or hair follicle pull) for deep sequencing; paired with already-collected blood

Highest remaining yield genetics test given two negative germline trio workups. Every germline assay in Levi's file explicitly excludes mosaicism; tissue-based deep sequencing directly addresses that gap.

What we'd learn

Detects low-VAF (down to 1-2 percent) somatic variants in PIK3CA, MTOR, AKT3, AKT1, PTEN, TSC1/2, and related overgrowth-pathway genes in tissues that are more likely than blood to carry the mosaic lineage. Can use targeted deep sequencing panels (>=500x) or ddPCR of known hotspots.

Effect on root cause theories
  • Promotes

    Somatic (mosaic) variant in the PI3K-AKT-mTOR or related overgrowth pathway

    A pathogenic low-VAF variant at a PROS / mTORopathy hotspot confirms this theory and opens pathway-targeted treatment.

  • Rules out

    Germline PI3K-AKT-mTOR variant

    Although a tissue-mosaic finding is technically not germline, it would reclassify the overall category and effectively close the germline-variant branch.

Effect on treatment options

A positive result would make targeted therapy (rapamycin, everolimus, or alpelisib depending on gene and variant) a real, pathway-justified option with growing pediatric safety data. A negative result, combined with the existing negative germline data, substantially narrows the genetic differential.

Limited availability
Next steps
  • Consult medical genetics about whether a commercial PROS panel on buccal / skin is available locally or whether a research lab (e.g. Mirzaa, Aldinger, Poduri) is the better route.
  • Consider simultaneous banking of multiple tissues (skin, buccal, hair).
  • Consider re-running existing WGS BAMs with somatic callers (MuTect2-style paired tumor/normal) before collecting new tissue.
#2
Methylation / imprinting panel targeted at overgrowth loci (11p15 BWS, 5q35 Sotos, 7q32, 14q32, 15q11-q13)

recommended_not_done

Geneticsblood

Covers the class of epigenetic overgrowth etiologies that germline WGS does not directly detect. Second-highest remaining yield after tissue mosaic sequencing.

What we'd learn

Identifies methylation defects and uniparental disomy at known overgrowth-associated imprinted loci. Several Sotos-adjacent and BWS-spectrum presentations have a methylation-only mechanism with no detectable coding-region variant.

Effect on root cause theories
  • Refines

    Overgrowth syndrome outside the mTOR axis (epigenetic/imprinting mechanism)

    A methylation signature at 11p15 or 5q35 would confirm a specific imprinting / epigenetic etiology despite the negative germline workups. Clean panel would substantially close this residual.

Effect on treatment options

Syndrome-specific surveillance changes (BWS tumor screening, Sotos skeletal and tumor surveillance) but does not by itself alter acute DEE-SWAS management.

Clinically available
Next steps
  • Order through Stanford Medical Genetics (Melanie Manning MD / Devon Bonner LCGC) or directly via a reference lab that offers MS-MLPA for BWS + Sotos + other imprinted loci (GeneDx, Baylor, or equivalent).
  • Consider a methylome array (genome-wide methylation) as a single test covering multiple loci if available.
#3
Repeat LP with CSF cytokines, CSF AE antibody panel, CSF neopterin, CSF neurotransmitter metabolites (HVA, 5-HIAA), CSF folate

recommended_not_done

CSF / LPcerebrospinal fluid (traumatic tap complicated the first LP; schedule at a time when steroid effect is well characterized)

Directly tests the seronegative cell-mediated neuroinflammatory hypothesis and closes the single most important gap from the April 7, 2026 LP (which did not send any cytokines, AE antibodies, neopterin, neurotransmitter metabolites, or folate). Also addresses neurotransmitter / folate / pterin disorder considerations.

What we'd learn

Direct compartmental measurement of CNS inflammation and neurotransmitter/pterin/folate physiology. Distinguishes compartmentalized cell-mediated CNS inflammation from a purely peripheral cytokine signal. Adds CSF AE panel, addressing the one missing piece of the classical AE workup. Rules in or out CNS folate/pterin disorders.

Effect on root cause theories
  • Refines

    Seronegative cell-mediated / Th1-Th17-biased neuroinflammatory contribution

    Elevated CSF IL-1beta / TNF / IL-6 / IL-17 or elevated neopterin would be the strongest single-test evidence for CNS inflammation and would promote this theory. A clean CSF cytokine profile off steroids would substantially down-weight it.

  • Refines

    Classical antibody-positive autoimmune encephalitis

    Positive CSF AE antibody (particularly NMDA-R) with negative serum is the classic pediatric pattern. Negative CSF AE panel combined with the negative March 2026 serum panel effectively excludes this theory.

Effect on treatment options

CSF-documented inflammation justifies sustained immunomodulation (repeat IV steroid pulses, IVIG, possibly rituximab or tocilizumab in refractory cases). Clean CSF off steroids makes continued immunomodulation harder to justify and may shift toward genetic or idiopathic-DEE-SWAS management.

Clinically available
Next steps
  • Coordinate with UCSF neurology team (Aylin Ulku and Genesis Trejo).
  • Time the LP relative to steroid taper so results are interpretable.
  • Pre-order the specific add-on assays (CSF cytokine panel including IL-6, CSF NMDA-R and full AE panel, neopterin, HVA/5-HIAA, folate). 2026-04-19 - explicitly include IL-6 since Kessi 2019 implicates IL-6 in CSWS pathogenesis and IL-6 is a canonical HPA-axis activator (Papanicolaou 1998); a positive CSF IL-6 finding would strengthen both the seronegative-cell-mediated-neuroinflammation theory and the new hypothalamic-hpa-axis-contribution theory simultaneously.
#4
Specialized pediatric-epilepsy neuroradiology re-read of Apr 7 MRI (focus on subtle FCD, mosaic mTORopathy features, and re-characterization of the R>L periventricular white matter signal)

recommended_not_done

Imagingexisting imaging study (April 7, 2026)

The full radiology report is now captured (no structural abnormality to explain seizures; nonspecific R>L periventricular deep white matter FLAIR, hippocampi normal, unremarkable MRS over left basal ganglia). A dedicated re-read by a pediatric-epilepsy neuroradiologist with explicit attention to subtle FCD and mosaic mTORopathy features would test whether anything has been missed on a general read. Expected yield is modest given the structurally unremarkable first read, but non-trivial given the mosaic-mTOR differential.

What we'd learn

A dedicated re-read focuses on (1) whether any subtle FCD is present at higher-resolution sequences, (2) whether mosaic-overgrowth patterns (hemispheric asymmetry, periventricular nodular heterotopia, subtle cortical-subcortical abnormalities, focal cortical thickening) are present, and (3) a more specific characterization of the R>L periventricular FLAIR signal than "nonspecific / may represent sequela of prior injury."

Effect on root cause theories
  • Refines

    Germline or mosaic variant in the PI3K-AKT-mTOR axis

    A subtle cortical tuber, FCD, or hamartomatous lesion on expert re-read would promote the mTORopathy hypothesis. Clean re-read through an mTORopathy lens meaningfully reduces the prior.

  • Refines

    Structural or vascular/perinatal etiology

    Subtle FCD may be missed on summary reads and would promote this theory. Clean expert re-read reduces it.

Effect on treatment options

A cortical tuber or FCD would redirect the workup toward possible surgical evaluation. Clean re-read supports continued medical/immunomodulatory management.

Clinically available
Next steps
  • Obtain the full radiology report from UCSF or Stanford PACS.
  • Request re-read by a pediatric neuroradiologist experienced with mTORopathies and DEE-SWAS.
  • 2026-04-19 - explicitly enumerate the hypothalamus and pituitary (sellar/parasellar region) in the re-read request, given the new hypothalamic-hpa-axis-contribution theory and the 1.5-year nocturnal arousal/hyperphagia phenotype documented in `content/vault/records/2026-04-19-note-nocturnal-hyperphagia-addendum.md`. Question to ask the re-reader - is there any subtle hypothalamic asymmetry, pituitary-stalk abnormality, posterior-pituitary bright-spot loss, or pituitary-size/morphology deviation that might be missed on a general read?
  • Extract into content/vault/records/.
#5
Repeat serum cytokine panel off steroids (timing coordinated with taper)

recommended_not_done

Bloodserum

The April 6, 2026 Th1/Th17-weighted cytokine pattern is the strongest single inflammatory signal in the corpus. Repeat off steroids is needed to distinguish residual January 2026 effect from an active ongoing process.

What we'd learn

Confirms whether the April 6 Th1/Th17 serum signature reflects active ongoing inflammation or residual effect / treatment artifact. Glucocorticoid exposure is a well-documented confounder of TH17 differentiation (JACI 2018) so off-steroid reassessment is essential for interpretation.

Effect on root cause theories
  • Refines

    Seronegative cell-mediated / Th1-Th17-biased neuroinflammatory contribution

    Persistent elevation off steroids raises the prior for an active inflammatory process. Normalization off steroids meaningfully lowers it.

Effect on treatment options

Persistent serum cytokine elevation off steroids, together with CSF data, would tilt toward sustained immunomodulation. Normalization argues against additional immunotherapy absent new evidence.

Clinically available
Next steps
  • Schedule after steroid taper completes.
  • Include sIL-2R, IFN-gamma, TNF-alpha, IL-17, IL-13 at minimum, plus IL-6 (now explicitly required), IL-10, and IL-1beta. 2026-04-19 - IL-6 elevated to required because Kessi 2019 specifically implicates IL-6 in CSWS pathogenesis and IL-6 is a canonical HPA-axis activator (Papanicolaou 1998); a positive serum IL-6 elevation off steroids would simultaneously strengthen the seronegative-cell-mediated-neuroinflammation theory and the new hypothalamic-hpa-axis-contribution theory.
#6
Repeat overnight EEG with quantitative spike-wave index at 4-8 weeks

recommended_not_done

EEGovernight EEG

Confirms durability of the near-resolution achieved April 6-7 and provides the first quantitative SWI benchmark in the repo. Anchors treatment-escalation decisions.

What we'd learn

Quantitative SWI during sleep confirms durability of the April 6-7 near-resolution and provides the first objective SWI benchmark for Levi. Establishes the baseline against which future steroid decisions and adjunct therapy can be measured.

Effect on root cause theories
  • Context

    Idiopathic multifactorial DEE-SWAS

    EEG documents syndrome severity and durability but does not adjudicate underlying etiology.

  • Refines

    Seronegative cell-mediated neuroinflammatory contribution

    Rapid relapse off steroids would strengthen the inflammatory-driver interpretation; durable suppression through a steroid taper makes ongoing active inflammation less likely.

Effect on treatment options

A rebound in SWI triggers a pre-specified rule for further steroid pulses, slower taper, or escalation to IVIG / other immunomodulation. Durable suppression supports staying the course with developmental support.

Clinically available
Next steps
  • Coordinate with Stanford pediatric epileptology (Christopher Lee-Messer, MD, PhD).
  • Request quantitative SWI rather than qualitative reads.
#7
Chromosomal microarray (DONE — normal)

done

Geneticsblood

RESOLVED 2026-04-18 ingestion. A standalone CMA was performed - Quest Diagnostics ClariSure OligoSNP chromosomal microarray, collected 2024-05-24 (same venous draw as the Stanford initial workup and first EKG), reported 2024-06-05. Ordered by Dr. Christine Hurley; send-to LPCH Clinical Lab. Result - NORMAL MALE, arr(X,Y)x1,(1-22)x2. No reportable CNVs or regions of homozygosity. This SNP-array class of assay is independently negative alongside the GeneDx 2026 trio WGS CNV calling, so the CMA-coverage question is fully resolved.

What we'd learn

Submicroscopic deletions/duplications across the genome (CMA-class resolution). CNVs in 16p11.2, 22q11.2, 15q11-q13, and several other regions are classic neurodevelopmental contributors. Also large runs of homozygosity (ROH) indicating UPD or consanguinity.

Effect on root cause theories
  • Refines

    Idiopathic multifactorial DEE-SWAS

    A pathogenic CNV would have reclassified the case away from idiopathic-multifactorial. Result normal; remains idiopathic from this assay's perspective.

  • Rules out

    Germline PI3K-AKT-mTOR axis

    No large CNV / ROH at PTEN, PIK3CA, TSC1, TSC2, AKT, or mTOR loci (CMA-class resolution only; does not exclude point variants).

  • Refines

    Sotos / Weaver / chromatinopathy / imprinting

    No large CNV / ROH at 5q35 (NSD1/Sotos), 11p15 (BWS imprinted region), 2q23.1 (MBD5), or other imprinted regions detected. Methylation-mechanism disease remains untested (MS-MLPA outstanding), so this is a partial refinement rather than full elimination.

Effect on treatment options

None; negative result.

Clinically available
Next steps
  • No further action required; closes the CMA coverage gap.
#8
Formal skin exam with Wood's lamp and ophthalmologic exam (retinal hamartomas)

recommended_not_done

Examexam

Cheap, fast, high-information-per-dollar tests for TSC (hypomelanotic macules, angiofibromas, retinal hamartomas) and PTEN-associated features. Negative result meaningfully down-weights those specific syndromes; positive redirects testing.

What we'd learn

Detects the cutaneous and retinal findings that are specific for TSC (hypomelanotic macules, angiofibromas, retinal hamartomas) and PTEN-associated disease (trichilemmomas, mucocutaneous lesions). Very low cost; very high yield if positive.

Effect on root cause theories
  • Refines

    Germline or mosaic variant in the PI3K-AKT-mTOR axis

    Positive findings would promote TSC or PTEN specifically and would accelerate pathway-targeted testing. Clean exam meaningfully down-weights TSC while not excluding the broader axis.

Effect on treatment options

Positive findings may accelerate the decision to start mTOR-pathway-directed therapy and triggers syndrome-specific surveillance.

Clinically available
Next steps
  • Request from dermatology or geneticist during the next visit.
  • Add ophthalmology referral if not already in place.
#9
IgG subclass panel + repeat total IgG

recommended_not_done

Bloodserum

Borderline-low IgG 518 on April 6, 2026 deserves subclass breakdown and a repeat value in the steady state. Low-yield for etiology but relevant for infection-risk management and for interpreting the serum cytokine signal.

What we'd learn

Characterizes whether the borderline-low April 6 total IgG 518 reflects a broad humoral deficit (all four subclasses down), a selective subclass deficiency (e.g., IgG2 in a subset of children), or a transient post-steroid or post-infection dip. Relevant both for infection-risk counseling and as context for IVIG candidacy if immunomodulation is escalated.

Effect on root cause theories
  • Context

    Seronegative cell-mediated neuroinflammatory contribution

    IgG subclass status is a safety / candidacy question rather than a mechanistic test for this theory.

Effect on treatment options

A clinically significant humoral deficiency shifts IVIG candidacy from "adjunct immunomodulation" toward "replacement therapy with incidental immunomodulation" and changes dose / frequency decisions. Normal subclasses remove that consideration.

Clinically available
Next steps
  • Order IgG subclasses 1-4.
  • Repeat total IgG, IgA, IgM, IgE in 4-8 weeks.
#10
Urine organic acids (if not already obtained)

recommended_not_done

Urineurine

Closes the remaining minor gap in the IEM workup. Expected to be normal given the comprehensive plasma panel, but cheap and finalizes the metabolic differential.

What we'd learn

Completes the organic acidemia / fatty acid oxidation / urea cycle workup not fully covered by the January 2026 plasma panels. Expected to be normal given prior normal plasma amino acids, acylcarnitines, MMA, homocysteine, ammonia, and creatine disorder panel.

Effect on root cause theories
  • Rules out

    Classical inborn error of metabolism

    Clean urine organic acids combined with the existing normal plasma metabolic panel effectively closes the IEM bucket.

Effect on treatment options

Clean result removes IEM from active consideration; would not by itself change current management.

Clinically available
Next steps
  • Confirm whether already done in the Stanford record set; if not, order.
#11
Clinical chart review of the January 2026 illness (source of the leukocytosis)

recommended_not_done

Othermedical record review (no new draw)

The Jan 16, 2026 WBC 24.2 is the strongest single upstream inflammatory data point in the case. Identifying its source (or confirming none was identified) changes the post-infectious hypothesis and may redirect testing (e.g., mycoplasma, EBV, HHV-6 serologies if not done).

What we'd learn

Identifies whether a specific infection or febrile illness was documented around Jan 16, 2026. A pulled symptom history (late Dec 2025 – Jan 2026) may also reveal encounters not captured in current extractions and can redirect convalescent serology.

Effect on root cause theories
  • Refines

    Post-infectious or peri-inflammatory trigger (January 2026)

    Identifying a specific infection promotes this theory and may trigger targeted convalescent serology (mycoplasma, EBV, HHV-6, SARS-CoV-2). No documented illness keeps the theory plausible but unverified.

Effect on treatment options

Documented post-infectious trigger can motivate inclusion of post-infectious immunomodulation in the longitudinal plan. No change to acute DEE-SWAS management.

Clinically available
Next steps
  • Pull all Stanford encounters in late December 2025 and January 2026.
  • If an infectious workup was started and not completed, consider catching up with convalescent serologies.
#12
Repeat stool metagenomics (Tiny Health or clinical equivalent) in 2026

optional

Stoolstool

Provides a post-acute-event microbiome comparison against the May 2025 baseline. Would only shift treatment if a dramatic shift is found; otherwise confirms the May 2025 low-likelihood gut-brain driver.

What we'd learn

Post-acute-event snapshot of Levi's gut microbiome against the May 2025 baseline. Detects shifts in diversity, histamine-producer abundance, Akkermansia level, and LPS index that may correlate with the January 2026 event and the April 2026 spike-wave escalation.

Effect on root cause theories
  • Refines

    Gut microbiome-driven neurodevelopmental phenotype

    Dramatic post-acute dysbiosis would promote the gut-brain hypothesis. A pattern similar to May 2025 would confirm the low-likelihood interpretation.

Effect on treatment options

Substantial dysbiosis could motivate targeted dietary / probiotic intervention. A preserved pattern supports not prioritizing microbiome-directed intervention.

Clinically available
Next steps
  • Decide whether the gut-brain hypothesis is being actively pursued.
  • If yes, run now before any planned dietary or probiotic intervention.
#13
Cooperative repeat EKG and cardiology review before any QT-prolonging medication

recommended_not_done

OtherEKG + cardiology consult

Baseline cardiac rhythm and QTc are currently unknown. The May and July 2024 Stanford EKGs were both captured while Levi was not cooperative (the July tracing also had documented baseline artifact) and should be treated as uninterpretable. A cooperative repeat EKG and pediatric-electrophysiology review are needed as standard pre-medication cardiology clearance before any new AED, stimulant, or other QT-prolonging drug.

What we'd learn

An actual cooperative baseline QTc measurement and pediatric-electrophysiology interpretation. The 460 and 452 ms values from the 2024 tracings are automated reads from non-cooperative acquisitions and do not count as a usable baseline.

Effect on treatment options

A cooperative repeat EKG with a truly normal QTc lifts the caution for QT-prolonging candidate regimens. A prolonged QTc on a cooperative tracing restricts the candidate AED / stimulant / psychopharm list (avoid sotalol, amiodarone, citalopram, methylphenidate combinations, certain atypical antipsychotics) and changes the safety calculus around several DEE-SWAS second-line options.

Clinically available
Next steps
  • Schedule a cooperative repeat EKG, ideally with pediatric-friendly positioning and desensitization, before any new QT-prolonging drug regimen is considered.
  • Request pediatric-cardiology / electrophysiology review (Henry Chubb, MD at Stanford / LPCH is documented as the most recent reader).
  • 2026-04-17 - the prior framing of a "persistent borderline QTc signal" across the 460 -> 452 sequence is superseded; treat baseline as unknown.
#14
AM cortisol + ACTH (table-stakes baseline HPA-axis screen)

recommended_not_done

Bloodserum (drawn 7-9 AM)

Baseline single-point HPA assessment. Required first-pass anchor for the new hypothalamic-hpa-axis-contribution theory and a prerequisite for interpreting any downstream provocative testing. Cheap, low-burden, and never been done in Levi's record despite a 3-day IV methylprednisolone pulse and 1.5 years of nocturnal arousal phenotype.

What we'd learn

A morning cortisol below the pediatric AM threshold (Improda 2024 - <150 nmol/L = adrenal insufficiency; >=317 nmol/L = recovered) flags primary or secondary AI. A low cortisol with low/inappropriate ACTH localizes the lesion to pituitary or hypothalamus (consistent with the hypothalamic-hpa-axis-contribution theory). A low cortisol with appropriately elevated ACTH points to primary adrenal insufficiency. A normal AM cortisol meaningfully (but not completely) reduces the probability of a clinically significant HPA-axis defect.

Effect on root cause theories
  • Refines

    Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis dysfunction contributing to DEE-SWAS phenotype

    Low AM cortisol with low/inappropriate ACTH directly supports a central HPA defect and promotes this theory. Normal AM cortisol with normal ACTH reduces the prior but does not exclude (a single AM draw misses circadian-shift and stimulated-response abnormalities).

Effect on treatment options

A confirmed low cortisol motivates pediatric endocrinology consult, stress-dose policy education for the family in advance of any future steroid pulse or acute illness, and (depending on degree) maintenance hydrocortisone replacement. A normal value removes acute stress-dose concern but does not invalidate the case for further characterization (diurnal salivary cortisol).

Clinically available
Next steps
  • Coordinate with UCSF pediatrics or pediatric endocrinology; can be added to the next routine blood draw.
  • Time after steroid taper completes so glucocorticoid suppression is not the cause of a low value (or, if drawn before taper completes, document the steroid context explicitly).
#15
4-point diurnal salivary cortisol profile (wake, +30 min, late afternoon, bedtime)

recommended_not_done

Othersaliva (4 samples over 24 hours, home-collected)

Characterizes the cortisol circadian curve in a way a single AM draw cannot. Higher-yield than a single AM cortisol for the specific 1.5-year nocturnal-arousal phenotype, because a phase-shifted or flattened curve is exactly what a hypothalamic / suprachiasmatic-nucleus defect produces. Non-invasive (no needlestick) and pediatric-friendly.

What we'd learn

Detects (a) an elevated or earlier-than-normal cortisol awakening response (CAR), which would correlate with the 3 AM stimmy hyperarousal phenotype, (b) a flattened diurnal slope, which reflects HPA dysregulation, and (c) loss of the normal late-evening nadir. Sleep-HPA bidirectionality (Balbo 2010) means a disturbed cortisol curve and disturbed sleep can each cause the other; this test characterizes the cortisol-side signature.

Effect on root cause theories
  • Promotes

    Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis dysfunction contributing to DEE-SWAS phenotype

    A phase-advanced cortisol curve, an exaggerated CAR, or a flattened diurnal slope would directly support this theory and would tie the 3 AM nocturnal awakening phenotype to a measurable circadian-HPA signature.

  • Refines

    Seronegative cell-mediated neuroinflammatory contribution

    A flattened cortisol curve in the presence of elevated IL-6 (when measured) would be consistent with a cytokine-driven HPA dysregulation pattern, supporting convergence between this theory and the hypothalamic-HPA theory.

Effect on treatment options

An abnormal curve motivates pediatric endocrinology consult and may motivate (a) a pre-bedtime carbohydrate-protein snack trial, (b) sleep hygiene optimization, and (c) consideration of melatonin to address the circadian-phase component independently of HPA. A normal curve substantially down-weights the HPA-axis theory (without fully excluding it).

Clinically available
Next steps
  • Order through pediatric endocrinology; many reference labs (LabCorp, Quest, ZRT, Genova) offer 4-point salivary cortisol home collection kits.
  • Coordinate with the structured sleep diary so the cortisol samples and the sleep/arousal log are time-aligned.
#16
Hypothalamic-pituitary panel (IGF-1, IGF-BP3, prolactin, TSH + free T4, fasting leptin)

recommended_not_done

Bloodserum (fasting morning draw preferred)

Multi-axis screen of pituitary output and hypothalamic appetite regulation. Specifically motivated by (a) the cross-cutting endocrine overlap evidence (Maines 2021 PI3K-AKT-mTOR -> hypoglycemia / GH-axis abnormalities; Hage 2019 TBRS -> GH-secreting pituitary adenoma; Chen 2017 mTOR -> pituitary; Muta 2013 mTOR -> hypothalamic), (b) the 1.5-year hyperphagia phenotype, and (c) van Santen 2023 hypothalamic-syndrome screening recommendations. Cannot be substituted by AM cortisol/ACTH alone.

What we'd learn

IGF-1 + IGF-BP3 screen the somatotropic axis (relevant to both Hage 2019 TBRS and to overgrowth/PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway); these are particularly important if the overgrowth-dnmt3a-tbrs theory stays live. Prolactin screens hypothalamic dopaminergic restraint (loss = hypothalamic dysfunction or stalk effect). TSH + free T4 screen central vs. primary hypothyroidism. Fasting leptin screens hypothalamic appetite regulation (relevant to the Prader-Willi / ROHHAD / MC4R / leptin-POMC axis differential motivated by the nocturnal hyperphagia phenotype - Lazea 2021 ROHHAD review).

Effect on root cause theories
  • Refines

    Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis dysfunction contributing to DEE-SWAS phenotype

    Multiple-axis pituitary output abnormalities (e.g., low IGF-1 + central hypothyroidism + abnormal prolactin) would suggest a multi-axis hypothalamic / pituitary defect and substantially promote this theory. Isolated abnormalities still inform but with less weight.

  • Refines

    TBRS (DNMT3A overgrowth)

    Hage 2019 documents a GH-secreting pituitary macroadenoma in TBRS. An elevated IGF-1 / IGF-BP3 in Levi would be a specific positive signal for TBRS-spectrum pituitary involvement and would motivate a dedicated pituitary MRI.

  • Refines

    Germline or mosaic PI3K-AKT-mTOR variant

    PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway directly couples to GH/IGF-1 and somatotroph development. Abnormal IGF-1 in either direction would be consistent with this theory.

Effect on treatment options

Specific pituitary-output abnormalities trigger pediatric endocrinology consultation, axis-specific replacement (e.g., levothyroxine for central hypothyroidism), and re-prioritization of the genetic differential. Abnormal leptin would prompt a hypothalamic-obesity / Prader-Willi-spectrum workup.

Clinically available
Next steps
  • Order through pediatric endocrinology; bundle with the AM cortisol + ACTH draw to minimize needlesticks.
  • Time after steroid taper completes so prolactin and IGF-1 are not glucocorticoid-suppressed.
#17
Two-week actigraphy + structured parent-completed sleep diary

recommended_not_done

Otherwrist actigraphy device + paper or app diary (no blood draw)

Instruments the 1.5-year nocturnal arousal pattern (`content/vault/records/2026-04-19-note-nocturnal-hyperphagia-addendum.md`) without any needlestick or sedation. Provides a quantitative baseline against which any future intervention (pre-bedtime snack, melatonin, sleep-hygiene change) can be measured. Should ideally be time-aligned with the 4-point salivary cortisol collection so cortisol and arousal data are paired.

What we'd learn

Quantifies (a) frequency and timing distribution of nocturnal awakenings (parent-reported \"around 3 AM\" -> objective time-of-night histogram), (b) sleep-onset latency, (c) total sleep time, (d) sleep efficiency, (e) whether the awakenings cluster in the 1-5 AM window or are more broadly distributed. Establishes the durable baseline so intervention effects are interpretable.

Effect on root cause theories
  • Refines

    Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis dysfunction contributing to DEE-SWAS phenotype

    A confirmed circadian-clustered arousal pattern (rather than randomly distributed awakenings) would support a hypothalamic / circadian-HPA driver. A randomly distributed pattern would be more consistent with a behavioral or epileptiform-arousal driver.

  • Context

    Idiopathic multifactorial DEE-SWAS

    Sleep characterization documents phenotype severity but does not adjudicate underlying etiology of the DEE-SWAS itself.

Effect on treatment options

A documented circadian-clustered pattern justifies (a) a structured pre-bedtime snack trial, (b) a structured melatonin trial, and (c) sleep-hygiene optimization, all of which need a pre/post benchmark to evaluate. A randomly distributed pattern with high behavioral-reinforcement features would tilt toward behavioral / sleep-medicine consultation rather than endocrine intervention.

Clinically available
Next steps
  • Coordinate with sleep medicine or pediatric neurology; many centers (UCSF, Stanford) loan actigraphy devices for 2-week home studies.
  • Provide family with a structured diary template that captures wake time, perceived arousal character (calm vs. stimmy vs. distressed), pantry-seeking behavior, and re-settling time.
  • Time-align with the 4-point salivary cortisol collection.
#18
Opportunistic critical-sample capture during a nocturnal awakening (glucose + cortisol + insulin + GH)

recommended_not_done

Bloodserum + capillary glucose, drawn within 30 minutes of a nocturnal arousal

Lower priority given the calm/stimmy/non-distressed character of Levi's awakenings (which argues against severe counter-regulatory hypoglycemic awakening), but still worth capturing if an awakening occurs during an inpatient admission or sleep study. Maines 2021 establishes that PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway defects can cause occult hypoglycemia, so a single critical sample is the only definitive way to rule it out for Levi specifically.

What we'd learn

A simultaneous glucose, cortisol, insulin, and GH at the moment of a nocturnal arousal directly tests (a) whether the awakening is driven by hypoglycemia (Maines 2021 PI3K-AKT-mTOR -> hypoglycemia, or hyperinsulinism), (b) whether the cortisol counter-regulatory response is appropriate, and (c) whether GH secretion is appropriately suppressed (high GH at this time would be unusual). The calm/stimmy presentation argues against severe hypoglycemia clinically, but a single confirmed normal glucose during one awakening would meaningfully close the question.

Effect on root cause theories
  • Refines

    Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis dysfunction contributing to DEE-SWAS phenotype

    An exaggerated cortisol/ACTH surge at the moment of awakening would directly support a mistimed pre-waking HPA surge. A flat cortisol response at the moment of awakening would argue against an HPA-driven awakening.

  • Refines

    Germline or mosaic PI3K-AKT-mTOR variant

    A documented hypoglycemia +/- hyperinsulinism at the moment of awakening would be a specific positive signal for a PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway defect (Maines 2021).

Effect on treatment options

Documented hypoglycemia at awakening is itself a treatment indication (pre-bedtime carbohydrate-protein snack, possibly cornstarch, possibly continuous glucose monitoring). A documented exaggerated HPA surge motivates a different conversation about evening melatonin or alpha-2-agonist (clonidine, already on board) optimization.

Clinically available
Next steps
  • Pre-specify the panel to draw and the labels to use during any future inpatient admission, sleep study, or overnight EEG.
  • Equip the family with a home glucometer to capture point-of-care glucose at the time of an awakening (cannot capture cortisol/insulin/GH at home, but home glucose alone would partly answer the question).
  • Lower priority than ranks 14-17 because of the calm/stimmy/non-distressed phenotype, but worth capturing opportunistically.
#19
Overnight EEG with pre-specified arousal annotation (during the next planned overnight EEG, item 6)

recommended_not_done

EEGovernight EEG (no separate study; rider on the planned repeat overnight EEG, item 6 repeat-eeg-quantitative-swi)

Pre-specifies that any nocturnal arousal during the next overnight EEG is annotated on the trace, so endocrine-driven and epileptiform-driven awakenings can be distinguished retrospectively. No additional cost or burden if attached to the already-planned repeat overnight EEG (item 6).

What we'd learn

An EEG-correlated nocturnal arousal answers a question that is otherwise unanswerable - is the awakening time-locked to a subclinical epileptiform burst (peri-ictal arousal driven by residual SWI), or does it arise from clean background (consistent with an endocrine / circadian / behavioral driver)? This separates the seronegative-cell-mediated-neuroinflammation / DEE-SWAS branch of explanations from the hypothalamic-HPA / circadian branch.

Effect on root cause theories
  • Refines

    Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis dysfunction contributing to DEE-SWAS phenotype

    A documented arousal arising from clean EEG background promotes the HPA / circadian explanation. An arousal time-locked to a subclinical epileptiform burst weakens the HPA branch and points to peri-ictal arousal.

  • Refines

    Seronegative cell-mediated neuroinflammatory contribution

    An arousal time-locked to a residual epileptiform burst would point to ongoing nocturnal SWI-driven physiology and would tilt toward continued or escalated immunomodulation / SWI-suppressive treatment.

Effect on treatment options

An EEG-clean awakening tilts toward HPA / circadian / behavioral interventions (snack, melatonin, sleep hygiene, endocrinology workup). An EEG-correlated awakening tilts toward neurology-led management (taper decisions, possible second steroid pulse, possible alternate SWI suppressant).

Clinically available
Next steps
  • Add to the order set / clinical request for the next planned repeat overnight EEG (item 6).
  • Brief the EEG tech on what to annotate (any nocturnal arousal, with timestamp, character, and pantry-seeking behavior if observed).
#20
Formal van Santen 2023 hypothalamic-syndrome screening (9-domain re-scoring)

recommended_not_done

Otherclinical scoring exercise + targeted lab/imaging follow-up

A structured re-scoring of Levi's clinical phenotype against the van Santen 2023 pediatric hypothalamic-syndrome diagnostic criteria. Low-cost, primarily a chart-review exercise that leverages already-collected data plus the new ranks 14-19 once they return. Provides a defensible structured framework for the new hypothalamic-hpa-axis-contribution theory.

What we'd learn

A structured score across 9 domains (sleep / circadian, appetite / weight, body temperature, water/sodium balance, anterior pituitary axes, posterior pituitary, autonomic, behavioral, neurocognitive). Levi already meets criteria across multiple domains based on existing data (hyperphagia, temperature instability, high pain threshold, sleep/circadian disruption). Formal scoring provides (a) a defensible framework for endocrinology referral, (b) identification of any unscored domains worth probing, and (c) a baseline for longitudinal reassessment.

Effect on root cause theories
  • Refines

    Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis dysfunction contributing to DEE-SWAS phenotype

    A high van Santen score with multiple involved domains substantially promotes this theory and supports endocrinology referral. A low score across all 9 domains substantially down-weights it.

Effect on treatment options

A high score is the strongest case for pediatric endocrinology consultation as a longitudinal partner rather than as a one-time consultation. Drives the diagnostic workup priority order.

Clinically available
Next steps
  • Run the scoring exercise as a research-note-style document under content/research/notes/ once ranks 14-17 results return.
  • Use the score as the lead exhibit in any pediatric endocrinology referral letter.