Options and responses

Treatments

Ranked treatment options with mechanism, targets, efficacy evidence, side effects, and risks.

#1
Maintain durable spike-wave suppression after the March 2026 steroid pulse response

active

Moderate evidence

The April 6-7, 2026 EEG showed near-total resolution of spike-wave activity after a 3-day IV methylprednisolone pulse. The immediate goal is to hold that suppression long enough to document durability and to measure cognitive trajectory.

Mechanism of action

Sustained electrographic suppression of the spike-wave burden during the sleep window is the single best-documented driver of cognitive preservation in DEE-SWAS.

Targets
spike-wave activity during sleepDEE-SWAS electrographic signaturecognitive preservation during the suppressed-EEG window
Efficacy

For Levi specifically, the 3-day IV methylprednisolone pulse produced near-total electrographic resolution within two weeks - a concrete, individually-demonstrated response. The broader DEE-SWAS/CSWS literature (Buzatu 2009, Kotagal 2017, van den Munckhof 2024 RESCUE-ESES RCT, 2025 DEE-SWAS strategies review) supports corticosteroids as a first-line option with roughly 45-70 percent response rates and with durability contingent on taper design. Evidence quality is moderate rather than strong because most DEE-SWAS steroid data come from observational cohorts with heterogeneous protocols, not multi-arm RCTs.

Side effects
  • weight gain / cushingoid appearance during pulse
  • mood and behavior disturbance
  • sleep disruption
  • transient hyperglycemia
  • increased appetite
Risks
  • !adrenal suppression with prolonged or repeated dosing
  • !growth suppression if steroid exposure becomes chronic
  • !immunosuppression and infection risk
  • !bone density loss with extended exposure
  • !relapse of spike-wave activity on withdrawal (driving need for slow taper)
Next steps
  • Repeat overnight EEG in 4-8 weeks with quantitative SWI.
  • Pre-specify thresholds that would trigger an additional steroid pulse, a slower taper, or a switch to steroid-sparing immunomodulation.
  • Track clinical markers reported by caregivers (eye contact, eloping, AAC use, playground engagement) alongside electrographic data.
#2
Aggressive iron repletion

recommended_not_active

Moderate evidence

Iron 16 (January 2026), ferritin 27 with transferrin saturation 13 percent (April 2026) confirm chronic iron deficiency. Target ferritin above 50 and saturation above 20 percent.

Mechanism of action

Iron is a cofactor for dopamine synthesis, regulates sleep architecture, and has documented effects on seizure threshold. Iron deficiency is high-likelihood amplifier that is independently treatable with low downside.

Targets
chronic iron deficiencyseizure threshold amplificationdopaminergic / sleep / attentional function
Efficacy

Multiple pediatric studies and meta-analyses (2017 iron-deficiency-seizure-threshold model, 2024 febrile seizures meta-analysis) link iron deficiency to increased seizure susceptibility and to cognitive / sleep dysfunction. Iron repletion is low-risk and independently indicated for Levi's serial labs. Evidence is moderate rather than strong because randomized data specifically on seizure-outcome benefit of iron repletion in non-febrile DEE are limited.

Side effects
  • GI upset (nausea, constipation, dark stools)
  • metallic taste
  • staining of teeth with liquid formulations
Risks
  • !accidental overdose is toxic in children (requires secure storage)
  • !masking of underlying GI blood loss if present without further workup
Next steps
  • Start oral iron (ferrous sulfate or sucrosomial iron) per pediatrics dosing.
  • Recheck iron studies in 2-3 months.
  • If oral iron is poorly tolerated or malabsorption is suspected, escalate to IV iron per hematology.
#3
Cooperative baseline EKG and cardiology clearance before any new QT-prolonging medication

active_policy

Strong evidence

Not a therapy but a safety gate that should precede every new neuroactive medication decision.

Mechanism of action

Levi's baseline cardiac rhythm and QTc are currently unknown. The two 2024 Stanford EKGs were both captured while Levi was not cooperative (the July tracing also carries documented baseline artifact) and should be treated as uninterpretable rather than as evidence of a persistent borderline QTc. A cooperative repeat EKG is needed before any AED, stimulant, tricyclic, SSRI, atypical antipsychotic, or other QT-prolonging agent is started.

Targets
medication safetyQTc baseline establishment
Efficacy

Pre-prescription cardiology review and a cooperative baseline EKG are standard of care before starting a QT-prolonging pediatric regimen when a usable baseline tracing is not on file. Not a disease-modifying therapy, but well-supported as a safety policy. Prevents avoidable iatrogenic arrhythmia.

Risks
  • !potential delay in starting a needed medication while clearance is obtained
Next steps
  • Add a standing "cardiology review before QT-prolonging drug" requirement to the care plan.
  • Schedule a cooperative repeat EKG (with pediatric-friendly positioning / desensitization if needed) before starting any candidate drug with QT liability.
  • 2026-04-17 - the earlier framing of a "persistent borderline QTc (460 -> 452)" across the 2024 tracings is retired; treat baseline as unknown.
#4
Contingent steroid-sparing immunomodulation (IVIG; repeated IV methylprednisolone pulses; oral prednisolone taper)

considering

Limited evidence

Pre-specify the decision rule. Do not pre-commit to this family before CSF cytokine data are in hand, but have it ready so the next EEG or cytokine result can drive a decision rapidly.

Mechanism of action

If the spike-wave burden returns or the Th1/Th17 serum signature persists off steroids, DEE-SWAS evidence base supports IVIG or repeated IV steroid pulses as second-line immune-directed therapy.

Targets
seronegative cell-mediated CNS inflammationTh1/Th17-biased cytokine signaturespike-wave relapse contingency
Efficacy

RESCUE-ESES RCT (van den Munckhof 2024) directly compares corticosteroids vs clobazam as first-line in ESES and supports continued use of steroid-based regimens. Saudi multicenter IVIG observational data (2023) and the European steroid-practice survey (2025) describe real-world use of IVIG and pulsed methylprednisolone with documented but heterogeneous response. Evidence is limited rather than moderate because pediatric DEE-SWAS data on IVIG and repeated pulses remain observational and non-randomized.

Side effects
  • IVIG - headache, fever, chills, nausea during or after infusion
  • IV methylprednisolone - mood lability, sleep disruption, hypertension during pulse
  • oral prednisolone - weight gain, cushingoid appearance, behavioral effects
Risks
  • !IVIG - aseptic meningitis, thromboembolism, renal dysfunction, anaphylaxis (rare, IgA deficient)
  • !repeat steroid pulses - adrenal suppression, growth suppression, osteopenia, opportunistic infection
  • !cumulative steroid exposure without documented response should trigger off-ramp
Next steps
  • Discuss contingent plan with UCSF neurology team and Stanford epileptology.
  • Obtain repeat serum cytokine panel off steroids.
  • If CSF cytokines confirm CNS inflammation, this family moves up.
#5
Established DEE-SWAS second-line options (sulthiame, high-dose diazepam protocols)

considering

Moderate evidence

Keep in the explicit plan as fallback options if the current response is not durable and further immunomodulation is not indicated or tolerated.

Mechanism of action

Both sulthiame and high-dose benzodiazepine protocols are part of the established DEE-SWAS toolkit and can be used alongside or instead of steroid-based immunomodulation.

Targets
spike-wave activity during sleepGABAergic system (benzodiazepine protocols)carbonic anhydrase inhibition (sulthiame)
Efficacy

Both sulthiame and high-dose benzodiazepine protocols have observational evidence supporting their use in ESES/CSWS/DEE-SWAS. Kotagal 2017 reviews dosing regimens and response rates. The RESCUE-ESES RCT compares steroids to clobazam as first-line and documents meaningful response in the clobazam arm. Sulthiame is used extensively in European centers. Evidence is moderate-strength for ESES-spectrum; extrapolation to Levi's current stable-on-steroids state is indirect.

Side effects
  • benzodiazepines - sedation, behavioral disinhibition, respiratory depression, tolerance, withdrawal risk on abrupt discontinuation
  • sulthiame - paresthesias, anorexia, weight loss, hyperventilation, fatigue
Risks
  • !benzodiazepine dependence with long duration
  • !sulthiame availability is constrained in the US (compounding or import may be required)
  • !drug-drug interactions with other AEDs (e.g. lamotrigine levels)
Next steps
  • Confirm availability / supply considerations (sulthiame US availability can be constrained).
  • Discuss risk-benefit with Stanford epileptology.
#6
Ketogenic diet for DEE-SWAS

considering

Limited evidence

Not first-line now while current suppression is holding, but a real option in the medium term and worth discussing with a ketogenic-diet-experienced team if needed.

Mechanism of action

Ketogenic diet has documented efficacy in a subset of DEE-SWAS cases and is an option especially if drug-based approaches are insufficient or are complicated by QT concerns.

Targets
spike-wave activity during sleepdrug-resistant epilepsymetabolic / ketone-mediated seizure threshold modulation
Efficacy

Ketogenic diet has observational evidence in drug-resistant pediatric epilepsy and subsets of ESES/CSWS/DEE-SWAS. The 2025 DEE-SWAS treatment strategies review and the Practical Neurology DEE-SWAS review both list ketogenic diet as a considered second- or third-line option. Evidence in DEE-SWAS specifically is limited and observational rather than randomized; response is heterogeneous and depends heavily on diet team experience.

Side effects
  • GI upset (nausea, vomiting, constipation, diarrhea)
  • hypoglycemia during induction
  • hyperlipidemia
  • acidosis
  • kidney stones with long-term use
  • micronutrient deficiencies without careful supplementation
Risks
  • !growth suppression in pediatric patients on prolonged diet
  • !cardiomyopathy (rare) with selenium deficiency
  • !adherence burden on family and feeding team
  • !risk of inadequate caloric intake in a child with behavioral feeding constraints
  • !drug interactions (e.g. carbonic anhydrase inhibitors like topiramate increase acidosis risk)
Next steps
  • Identify a ketogenic dietitian and pediatric neurology team at Stanford or UCSF if this becomes relevant.
#7
Conditional mTOR-pathway-directed therapy (sirolimus / everolimus / alpelisib)

gated_on_mosaic_genetics

Limited evidence

Explicitly do not start without genetic or pathway-specific evidence. The germline branch is exhausted (Stanford trio exome + GeneDx trio WGS + reanalysis all negative). This now gates specifically on a positive mosaic / tissue-based sequencing finding. The downsides are significant and the evidence base is pathway-specific.

Mechanism of action

mTOR inhibitors (sirolimus, everolimus) have established roles in TSC-associated epilepsy and in PTEN/PI3K-AKT-pathway-positive disease. Alpelisib (PI3K-alpha inhibitor) is FDA-approved for PIK3CA-related overgrowth spectrum (PROS) in patients >=2 years. Without pathway-positive genetic confirmation, the risk-benefit does not favor empiric use in a child with Levi's current picture. Two negative germline workups have made empiric use less defensible, not more.

Targets
mTORC1 hyperactivationmTORC2 hyperactivation (context-dependent, evidence from Lasser 2024)PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway signaling downstream of PTEN / PIK3CA / TSC1 / TSC2epileptogenic network activity in mTORopathies
Efficacy

Pathway-positive disease has substantial evidence (everolimus for TSC-associated epilepsy is FDA-approved based on the EXIST-3 trial). Beyond TSC, mTOR inhibitors have published rationale and pre-clinical support (Roy 2015 PIK3CA mouse models; 2021 mTORopathies precision-medicine review; Lasser 2024 PTEN mTORC1/mTORC2 biology) but limited prospective human data outside TSC. Evidence for empiric use without genetic confirmation is insufficient and the risk profile does not support it.

Side effects
  • mouth ulcers / stomatitis
  • acne-like rash
  • hyperlipidemia
  • hyperglycemia
  • fatigue
  • impaired wound healing
  • amenorrhea / menstrual irregularity
Risks
  • !immunosuppression and opportunistic infection (including pneumocystis, reactivation of TB / hepatitis)
  • !pneumonitis / interstitial lung disease (black-box)
  • !nephrotoxicity
  • !drug interactions with CYP3A4 inhibitors / inducers
  • !growth and developmental effects with long-term pediatric use
  • !requires trough-level monitoring
Next steps
  • Germline workup is now complete (Stanford exome + GeneDx WGS + reanalysis all negative). The next gate is tissue-based mosaic-sensitive sequencing per diagnostic `mosaic-sensitive-tissue-sequencing`.
  • If a pathway-positive mosaic variant is identified, revisit with Stanford epileptology, medical genetics, and a PROS / mTOR-experienced center.
  • If negative, do not escalate to empiric mTOR inhibition.
#8
Aggressive developmental support during the window of electrographic suppression

recommended_not_active

Moderate evidence

Independent of etiology. The suppressed-EEG window is the highest-leverage time to invest in developmental gains.

Mechanism of action

The period immediately after spike-wave normalization is the window in which cognitive and language gains are most likely. Intensive speech / language / OT during this window is consistent with the DEE-SWAS recovery literature.

Targets
language / speechexpressive and receptive communication (AAC-assisted where helpful)fine and gross motor skillssocial engagement and joint attentionactivities of daily living
Efficacy

Early intensive developmental therapy during periods of electrographic suppression is consistent with general pediatric neurodevelopmental practice and with DEE-SWAS-specific recovery observations (Kotagal 2017, DEE-SWAS strategies review 2025). Evidence is moderate rather than strong because studies are observational; however, the intervention itself is low-risk and independently indicated.

Side effects
  • child fatigue / overwhelm if therapy schedule is too dense
  • caregiver burden (time, logistics, cost)
Risks
  • !over-scheduling can undermine sleep and therapy gains
  • !missed opportunity cost if the suppression window closes before therapies ramp up
#9
Enrollment in a DEE-SWAS / CSWS research registry

considering

Unknown

A cheap long-term bet that increases the chance of a future diagnostic reveal or trial eligibility. Worth pursuing in parallel with clinical workup.

Mechanism of action

Research registries and natural-history studies provide access to longitudinal cohort comparisons, genetic reanalysis, and advanced diagnostic options.

Targets
long-term cohort data accessfuture genetic / diagnostic reanalysis opportunitiestrial eligibility tracking
Efficacy

Registries are not a therapeutic intervention per se. Their "efficacy" is access to diagnostic reanalysis and trial opportunities over time. Value is indirect but well-established in rare-disease pediatric neurology.

Risks
  • !data-sharing / privacy considerations must be reviewed per registry
  • !time investment from family for enrollment and periodic updates
#10
Active constipation management (Miralax, hydration, diet)

active

Strong evidence

Miralax is already in intermittent use for Levi. Worth tracking explicitly because constipation overlaps with autonomic / hypothalamic differential features and because it can mask or mimic behavioral deterioration that might otherwise be read as an encephalopathy signal.

Mechanism of action

Polyethylene glycol 3350 is an osmotic laxative that softens stool and eases evacuation without systemic absorption. Untreated chronic constipation in a child with sensory and behavioral restrictions is a disproportionate driver of behavioral disruption, sleep disruption, and treatment non-adherence.

Targets
chronic constipationbehavioral comfort / baseline disruption confounders
Efficacy

Polyethylene glycol 3350 is the best-studied first-line pediatric laxative and is standard of care for functional constipation in children. Safety profile at maintenance dosing is well-characterized across pediatric populations.

Side effects
  • loose stools / diarrhea at higher doses
  • occasional bloating / abdominal cramping
Risks
  • !dehydration if not paired with adequate fluid intake
  • !masking of a structural / organic cause of constipation if used without initial evaluation
Next steps
  • Keep a running record of frequency and Bristol stool chart type so escalation / de-escalation decisions are grounded.
  • Pair with hydration and fiber where tolerable.
  • If ineffective at appropriate dose, reassess with pediatrics for alternatives.
#11
Avoid QT-prolonging psychopharm without a cooperative baseline EKG and cardiology input

active_policy

Strong evidence

Not a therapy decision but a guardrail that should be attached to any behavioral / psychiatric medication discussion.

Mechanism of action

TCAs, some SSRIs, stimulants, and some atypical antipsychotics can prolong QT. Levi's baseline QTc is currently unknown because the 2024 Stanford EKGs were captured while he was not cooperative and should not be treated as a usable baseline. The conservative default is therefore to avoid QT-prolonging psychopharm until a cooperative repeat EKG is obtained and a cardiologist has reviewed it.

Targets
QTc safetymedication-induced arrhythmia prevention
Efficacy

Avoidance of QT-prolonging drugs until a cooperative baseline EKG is on file and has been reviewed by pediatric cardiology is standard of care. Safety guardrail, not a disease-modifying therapy.

Risks
  • !may delay or complicate behavioral / psychiatric medication choices, requiring alternative (non-QT-prolonging) agents until a cooperative baseline EKG is obtained
#12
Structured pre-bedtime carbohydrate-protein snack trial

considering

Limited evidence

Low-cost, low-risk lifestyle probe of the 1.5-year nocturnal arousal / hyperphagia phenotype documented 2026-04-19 (`content/vault/records/2026-04-19-note-nocturnal-hyperphagia-addendum.md`). Pre-specify the snack composition, the 2-week observation window, and the metric (frequency of awakenings per week, captured in the structured sleep diary). A measurable reduction in awakening frequency would suggest a glycemic contribution and would motivate a critical-sample workup; no change argues against and would re-prioritize endocrine and circadian probes.

Mechanism of action

A small mixed carbohydrate-protein snack 30-60 minutes before bed slows overnight glucose decline and blunts the early-morning counter-regulatory cortisol/ACTH/catecholamine surge in children with marginal glucose reserves. Maines 2021 establishes that PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway defects can cause occult childhood hypoglycemia, including hypoglycemia presenting as nocturnal awakening. Even in the absence of confirmed hypoglycemia, a pre-bedtime snack is a cheap, reversible probe of whether the 1.5-year nocturnal arousal phenotype has a glycemic / counter-regulatory contribution.

Targets
1.5-year nocturnal awakening / hyperphagia phenotypeovernight glucose stabilityearly-morning counter-regulatory surge (cortisol, ACTH, GH, catecholamines)
Efficacy

Pre-bedtime snack is a standard pediatric-endocrinology recommendation for children with marginal overnight glucose reserves (e.g., glycogen storage disease, hyperinsulinism, GH deficiency, hypopituitarism) and is widely used as a first-pass probe even before formal critical-sample workup. Evidence for symptomatic improvement is largely observational. For Levi specifically, the test is low-risk and high-information regardless of mechanism - either it reduces awakenings (supports glycemic / counter-regulatory branch) or it does not (down-weights that branch).

Side effects
  • mild risk of dental caries with carbohydrate exposure at bedtime (mitigated by tooth-brushing before snack or sticking to lower-cariogenic foods)
  • small caloric load; not appropriate if there is a separate weight-management concern
Risks
  • !reinforcement of food-seeking behavior at bedtime if the snack is perceived as a reward
  • !delayed sleep onset if eaten too close to bedtime
  • !if the awakening is genuinely driven by hypoglycemia, a snack may treat symptoms while masking a treatable underlying condition (Maines 2021); for this reason the trial is specifically intended to be diagnostic, not just symptomatic, and should be paired with at least one critical-sample attempt during a future awakening.
Next steps
  • Pre-specify snack composition (e.g., string cheese + small piece of fruit; or peanut butter + whole-grain cracker) and timing (30-60 min before bed).
  • Run for 2 weeks paired with the structured sleep diary (diagnostic rank 17).
  • Coordinate with pediatric endocrinology so that a critical-sample plan (diagnostic rank 18) is in place if an awakening occurs during a future inpatient admission or sleep study.
#13
Sleep hygiene and consolidated sleep environment optimization

recommended_not_active

Moderate evidence

Foundational, low-cost, no medication. Worth tracking explicitly because it provides the substrate against which any pharmacologic or endocrine intervention is evaluated. If sleep hygiene is not optimized, attribution of any measured improvement (or non-improvement) to a snack trial, melatonin trial, or endocrine intervention is harder to interpret.

Mechanism of action

A consistent bedtime, dimmed evening light (low blue-light exposure 1-2 hours before bed), a cool dark quiet bedroom, and a consistent wake time stabilize circadian rhythm and reduce sleep fragmentation. Sleep-HPA bidirectionality (Balbo 2010) - sleep disruption causes HPA dysregulation and HPA dysregulation causes sleep disruption, so foundational sleep hygiene addresses one half of the loop independently of any biomedical intervention.

Targets
circadian phase stabilitysleep consolidationreduction of nocturnal arousal opportunities
Efficacy

Sleep hygiene is established standard-of-care advice for pediatric sleep disturbance and for circadian phase disorders. Effect sizes vary, but the intervention is universally recommended as the substrate before any pharmacologic or biomedical intervention. Particularly important for children with neurodevelopmental disorders, where sleep-onset and night-waking issues are common.

Side effects
  • family-burden / logistics burden if dramatic schedule changes are required
Risks
  • !over-restriction of evening time can become a behavior-management flashpoint without proportionate sleep benefit; should be implemented in consultation with the family's existing routine
Next steps
  • Establish or confirm a consistent bedtime / wake time, dimmed evening light starting 1-2 hours before bed, no screens in the bedroom, and a cool dark quiet sleep environment.
  • Coordinate with sleep medicine if questions arise.
  • Run as the foundation for the pre-bedtime snack trial (rank 12), the melatonin trial (rank 14), and the actigraphy/sleep diary (diagnostic rank 17).
#14
Trial of melatonin (0.3-3 mg) at a fixed evening time, pending sleep-medicine input

considering

Moderate evidence

Considered, not active. Should be implemented after sleep-hygiene baseline and ideally after the 4-point salivary cortisol curve (diagnostic rank 15) and 2-week actigraphy (diagnostic rank 17) are in hand so the pre-melatonin baseline is documented. Coordinate with sleep medicine or pediatric neurology for dosing guidance.

Mechanism of action

Low-dose melatonin (0.3-1 mg, physiologic) is a circadian phase-shifting agent and is widely used in pediatric neurodevelopmental populations both for sleep-onset latency and for circadian-phase consolidation. Higher doses (1-3 mg, supraphysiologic) may also have a soporific effect. In children with autism / DEE-spectrum disorders, melatonin has the strongest sleep evidence base of any over-the-counter or prescription pediatric sleep agent. Targets the circadian-phase component of the 1.5-year nocturnal arousal phenotype independently of any HPA intervention.

Targets
circadian phase consolidationsleep-onset latencyreduction of nocturnal arousal frequency in the 1-5 AM window
Efficacy

Pediatric melatonin has the strongest sleep evidence base in autism and neurodevelopmental disorders of any pediatric sleep agent. Dose-response and timing-response are individual; dosing too late in the evening can delay rather than advance phase. Long-term safety is generally reassuring at standard doses, with the main concern being product purity (over-the-counter products vary in actual content). Pharmacy-grade melatonin or compounded melatonin is preferred.

Side effects
  • morning grogginess (particularly at supraphysiologic doses)
  • vivid dreams
  • mild headache
  • mood lability (uncommon but reported)
Risks
  • !dose-timing mistiming can delay rather than advance circadian phase
  • !product-purity variability with over-the-counter melatonin gummies (use pharmacy-grade or compounded preparations)
  • !drug interactions with anticoagulants, antihypertensives, immunosuppressants (case-by-case review)
  • !long-term effects on pubertal timing remain incompletely characterized; coordinate with endocrinology if this becomes a multi-year intervention
Next steps
  • Coordinate with sleep medicine or pediatric neurology for dosing and timing guidance.
  • Establish baseline with sleep hygiene (rank 13) and actigraphy (diagnostic rank 17) first so a pre-melatonin baseline exists.
  • Consider pairing with the pre-bedtime snack trial (rank 12) as a separable second arm if the snack trial alone is insufficient.
#15
Conditional stress-dose steroid policy if AM cortisol or salivary cortisol confirms HPA insufficiency

gated_on_endocrine_results

Strong evidence

Safety policy, not a therapy. Gated entirely on diagnostic ranks 14-15 (AM cortisol + ACTH, 4-point salivary cortisol). If AM cortisol is normal and salivary cortisol curve is normal, no policy is needed beyond standard practice. If either is abnormal, a written stress-dose hydrocortisone plan should be in place before the next acute illness, surgery, dental procedure under sedation, or repeat steroid pulse.

Mechanism of action

Children with confirmed HPA-axis insufficiency (AM cortisol below pediatric AI threshold, blunted ACTH stimulation, or persistently low salivary cortisol curve) are at risk of adrenal crisis during physiologic stress (significant illness, surgery, severe injury, future high-dose steroid taper) without prophylactic hydrocortisone stress dosing. Levi has had one 3-day IV methylprednisolone pulse (March 2026) without explicit pre/post HPA characterization; if a future repeat pulse is considered, characterizing baseline HPA reserve and pre-emptively planning stress-dose policy reduces risk.

Targets
prevention of adrenal crisis during physiologic stresssafe planning of any future steroid pulse, surgery, or significant illness management
Efficacy

Stress-dose hydrocortisone for children with documented adrenal insufficiency is established standard of care in pediatric endocrinology. Not disease-modifying for DEE-SWAS, but a safety guardrail that prevents avoidable iatrogenic crisis. The "gated on diagnosis" framing means this is policy-conditional, not preemptive.

Side effects
  • none for the policy itself; hydrocortisone stress dosing is short-duration and used only during acute physiologic stress
Risks
  • !delay in implementation if the diagnostic workup is not completed before the next acute illness
  • !over-reliance on stress-dose policy without a definitive endocrine workup; the policy should follow, not substitute for, definitive AM cortisol + ACTH testing
Next steps
  • Complete diagnostic ranks 14-15 (AM cortisol + ACTH, 4-point salivary cortisol).
  • If abnormal, coordinate with pediatric endocrinology to establish a written stress-dose plan, family-facing dosing card, and emergency-department guidance.
  • Pre-emptively review with the treating team before any planned future steroid pulse, surgery under sedation, or anticipated illness.